List of public pages created with Protopage


Plain sticky notes

Welcome to My Study Buddies

Hello World! This is the second of my Open University Study Centres. I have now elected to use Protopage as the integration to my bespoke sofware. Protopage allows me a degree of flexibility that I find very productive. Sadly I managed to lose all my preparation when I exposed my Social Network using Wordpress. (Conditions of use!). Hopefully the stability of the Protopage product will prove its true value.

Rich sticky notes

Behind Closed Doors.

Welcome to my Social Network


It is not for me to say how much networking should be happening with the Open University. I have elected to play a passive role and jump in when things start to happen.


I may use this application just to communicate with my tutor.


The advantage that it has is it is with me whereever I go. I need not own a computer nor be concerned with what sofware my tutor has.


I can write to it using my mobile device and access it from an computer in the world.


I need not care where data lives nor be concerned of its security.


I can control access to who sees what and interface it with my learning material.


It is like having your brain out in the open for anybody to see.....


The great advantages is the clarity of communication and speed.


(But it is radical!) 

A very powerful tool...... But is it the right tool ?


The proof will be in the pudding!!!!


BramiT 06Vi07


Revisting Burns and Staker


There are times in your life when you realise just how humble you are!


Wesley D. Sine (Cornell University), Hitosh Mitsuashi, (University of Tsukuba), David A. Kirsch, (University Of Marlyland)  produced a piece of work of some substance which was published in the academy of Management journal, Vol 49, N01, 121-132.


This work 'Revisiting Burns and Staker: Formal Structure and New Venture Performance in Emerging Economic Sectors' it is a study that 'examines the effects of formal structure on the performance of new ventures in the emergent internat sector during the years 1996-2001'.


The convergence of internet technologies that was announced in 1998 is only now begining to show itself on the unsuspecting world. The arrival of Vista, Longhorn and Leopard will have an effect upon emerging economic sectors far greater than the impact of the personal computer back in 1984.


The work of these intellectuals is a fine example of the quality of work which students should aspire to. At my age I can only but admire the depth of knowledge an the hours of work that has gone into such a study My time has passed and I can only imagine what would have been my destiny taken a different path. Given the chance I would not hesitate to emulate theses fine scolars. This work should be inspirational to any child that reads it. 


But there again I would not have arrived here understanding what they are talking about. 

Read this and admire it:







Plain sticky notes

Y159 Results

I am very pleased to say that my results for my course were exceptional. I achieved all my objectves and based upon the results have elected to continue with my OU Education My expectations were that I would need to undertake a level 1 T175 Networked Living course, to warm me into the task. This I no longer feel is required and I can plan for the level 2 M256 Software Development withJava course, scheduled for February 2008.


I achieved success in the academic parts of the course and satisfied the criteria in the four section required. Where I underachieved was in the following areas. 1. Selects and evaluates appropriate evidence from the course material. 2. Clearly identifies and reference sources 3. Aware of learner needs and the use of study methods.

Course Feedback.

The support which I recieved from th OU was outstanding. This was more an evaluation of the OU as a learning partner than a test of my ability. My objectives were these. 1. To baseline my knowledge base. 2. To evaluate OU Student System.. 3. To evaluate my own communication skills an literacy. Since 2000 I have been conducting a study on education services and have experienced a nmber of learning environment. These include. 1. Full time government funded courses. 2. Atomic government funded home study. 3. Centre based electronic study. 4. Self financed part time education. 5. Self funded University education. All the above working towards acredited qualifications. In parallel to this I have been working within a community which educates a significant number of children on an unacredited program whilst working to develop my own solution. My OU experience was as much a self evaluation as an evaluation of the OU. Of all the courses which I have taken The OU is well out in front in terms of the delivery of students expectations. The Delivery Of Learning Course,(4), which I attended was a complete and utter shambes in terms of content, heatth and safety, learner resourses and learner support. Given this was is an entry point into teaching it is of major concern. ECDL Evaluation. (2). was interesting in that I declared that I wanted a specific qualification, having signed up paid my subscription and commenced study. I soon realised that I was on the wrong course, Learn Direct missed the mark there. It was also interesting that I completed the study and passed all the exams before the learning material arrived, the qualification took an age to arrive. My return to education,(1), was interesting too, I waned a 'C' programming qualification. This was a 15 week course which I had to negotiate my way onto with my tutor. I was accepted on the basis that I would not disrupt the class. In my first session I was advised that I would complete the 15 week course in four weeks and that they had prepared a special program to allow me to complete another two 15 week courses in the said time, (networking and web design - Good revenue!). The third of my research units was in centre based tuition. This was undertaken to evaluate the ECDL training which I commenced in (2). The realisation that the contents were 90% the same came as a shock, (More good revenue). I sent my time, as a Trojen, looking at courses that I had not subscribed to and utilising the print services, (Cost Benefit Analysis at work here), They bonus of free coffee and food.was welcomed too! Eventually I compressed my learning into four days when the UK government withdrew funding. I completed all the ECDL / ECDL Advanced / Web Publishing and Web Publishing Advanced before the funding ceased. Hot from that experience I was keen to teach in the community so I evaluated the C&G7302 course material before commecing the study - sadly my frustrations with the tutor resulted in my leaving the course and insisting upon a refund on the basis of a failure to deliver matarial to the standards of my expectations. In 2007 I decided to baseline my learning method at University level and infiltrated the ranks of the Open University. I selected a openings course in Management. I did not read the course material and that I compressed my learing into one session over three evenings and 'On the Critical Path' and the results were exceptional. This was directly due to the encouragement and enthusiams of the tutors and the OU. I expained my situation and they were 100% supportive in every department. One lesson learnt from this exercise was that some of my work was to the level expected quality expected of a Masters student, this came as a surprise, (it was also inapproprate). I learnt that the expectations of the OU are driven by the constraints an limitation of the learning material. (For the openings courses). I was surprised by the lack of community study - I expected to become one of a comunity of learners seaking social stimulation.. I observed fo 19 week the activities of the students without participation. (It being critical that my social networking research and development not infuence the learning of other) In conclusion: My study in the use of Social Networking within a learning environment was a great success. The positives are: 1. I know more about Management my qualifications show. 2. Futher education can be great fun and that a bad learning experience can be put behind you. In conclusion: The OU has returned my faith in teaching, (my C&G Experience damaged me having had success after success after success). I would like to close with a special thank you to Joe. It is quite a mystery how we got the refereing wrong given that this was the focus of my only tutorial. This is not a reflection upon Joe as a tutor as he clearly had success with his students. (He picked me up when Theresa went sick). With regards to the needs as a learner. My pre-assessment stated clearly my needs. I satisfied these and more too. For me education is about personal goals and achievments. For 30 years I have used Manchester University to further my projects. Further education helps me focus. In February 2008 I will commence a Java Course. It will take 9 months to complete. Before I start the course the material will have been completed and the model embedded into my Structure Social Networking Applications. I loved my experience with the OU and now look forward to the next enterprise. Vision 23 is now under way. The OU has restored my faith - £100 was such a small price for so much fun and support, it is monies well spent. . Thank you Theresa and Joe. Kindest Regards Alan IT Strategist, (Feb 2007 - ) What Next?.............................. Quo Vadis - Scheduled 10/10/2007, (iQuidam). Quidam (pronounced "key-DAHM"; IPA: [kiː'daːm]) means "a certain one/thing" or "anonymous passerby" . The work that you are now reading is in preparation for my next course M256 Software Development With Java. The objective being 1. 'The integration of Java applets into a SSNA CIS Infrastructure', (Code Name - Minerva.) Minerva was the daughter of Jupiter. She was considered to be the virgin goddess of warriors, poetry, medicine, wisdom, commerce, crafts, and the inventor of music. Jupiter, (02/02/2007), Nimrod / Vista Integration. (The result of Vision 22 April 2000 to Jan 2007 - Nimrod (נִמְרוֹד) means "Hunter"; was a Biblical Mesopotamian king mentioned in the Table of Nations) 2. Baseline Java Education Need and scope team / personal development plans. 3. Define Java development standard. SSNA is my term for 'Structured Social Networking within Community Information Systems. Welcome to - pre learning for Y159 Understanding Management, (Dec 2006).





Rich sticky notes


Please join the My Study Buddies Community today and we will display your membership just as soon as we have automated the process - In the mean time I will Hand Crank it from time to time.

NHS Revalidation



Rich sticky notes


This site is now going to be heavily geared to NHS Revalidation and Peer Mentoring.

Maxim's Law



NHS Infonets



IT Training



Stop Press News



Rich sticky notes

InfoNet Launch 30/03/2020 10:10:10Rich text note

We have made a major breakthrough with the discovery of an existing NHS Protopage learning website.

Triggering Maxim's Law set up and training at Bronte Ward

16th December 2020

Discovered another protopage user with an interest in education and economics.

Well done Ruchir





Rich sticky notes


Please Login with password : facxtv
to record your learning.



Bookmarks panel

Rich sticky notes

About My Study Buddies

Welcome to the YMGI Learning Environment. 

This is where we shall refine your lesson plans and session plans to ensure that your valuable time is best utilised.



My Study Buddies Learning Environment

BramiT 06VI07

Burn and Stalker Revisited.


One of the problems with the internet is information overload. The above article is a piece of work of some substance and is not untypical of the wealth of information that is freely avalable.


The problem with any study group is the recognition that data / information is reliable and relevant. The fact that the earth was the centre of the universe changed somewhat with the arrival of science.


It is very difficult for me to study as the volume of information that I am presented with fuels my learning. I have been called 'An Intelectual Vampire'. The very process of handling information has become a management procedure, I have refined the task. The act of study is now a problem where limitations and constraints have to be set.


Todays student have no better opportunity to learn. As Study Buddies they have a method by which they can collaborate and, by mutual consent, state the constraints and limitations. Defining the learning environment is now critical as it is the enquiring mind that will strain with infromation overload.


How this problem will be addressed in one for governments and educatioanlist.


Not me..



Bookmarks panel

Rich sticky notes

TMA01 Raw Text



"Even in our leisure time, we are all ‘managers’ now".

The OUY159 TMA01 set a task to write 900 words about time management. It is because I live and breath time management that I have elected to ignore the guidance given.

The course of action which I took before signing up for Y159 was to spend time completing all the activities having obtained access to the course material before enrolling. This was my preliminary assessment. Having established that the course is both achievable and relevant I then began to prepare my learning environment. My action plan was suspended some time whilst I awaited the arrival of the course material. A milestone was placed on my action plan to contact the OU three days before the start date to chase the course material. An action was placed on the plan to prepare a withdrawal letter 24 hours before the start time. An action was put on the plan to issue that letter at 00:01 on the scheduled start date in the event of the material not being received.


When conducting projects which involve more than one resource unit then effective communication is essential. Consistency is also an essential factor to getting things done. In my case having to manage multiple projects with multiple threads it is essential that I set tangible objectives and stand by them. Phases, activities and tasks are never committed to the baseline without three contingencies.


The effective management of a task is essential to the overall performance of the project. Throwing out the rulebook is allowed to meet the primary objective. My mission for attending the OU Y159 is to increase my knowledge. The qualification is of no real consequence. In the TMS01 case study I have elected to use my life skills to the best of my ability. I will lay out what I believe to be a true statement of my understanding of project management.

Effective project control is the recording of tasks and their relationship to each other so that the resources available can be managed in such a way that the use of said resources is done so with the best effect in terms of cost and project life cycle. Where a flexible end date is defined then the project duration may be extended or reduced to implement what is best for the client. Best could be cost or services, each project to be treated by its own merit having clearly defined the objectives from the offset.


Having competed my structured reading, skills assessment and brainstorming I will than go about satisfying the needs of my examining body. This, my initial document is for me, a working copy, a reference point to which I will append or delete objects according to the guidance of the Open University. This document is a collection of objects, in my case thoughts and ideas. Each paragraph can be considered an object in its own right.


I now have the simple process of marking, numbering and indexing my thought into a database. The key to this approach is the index. Having set the scene the reading material can be processed in the same way, each paragraph being treated as an object. The use of coloured marker pens is a useful tool. Finally, the guidance can be processed in the same way. Once again the use of colour and symbols is of great use when, in the final phase, the visualisation page is produced. This is where graphical interfaces come into play. A, vivid, vibrant image of the subject matter can then be produced. The use of modern technology is such that a reference point, X/Y co-ordinate on the image can be used to access video footage. This is forward thinking. The benefit of this is seen during the revision process. To retain knowledge a student needs to event manage his / her time. Revision 24 hours after the event is essential, 1 week, followed by one 1 month followed by 3 month is the key to retention. The use of images and multi-media revision aids is a recipe for success it is a lifestyle which you apply to every aspect of your life or none at all. Maintaining a consistent approach is essential for your own mindset and the effective communication to your team. By presenting effective communication to yourself you are in fact managing your life.


The OU Y159 is already restraining the learning process. This is in no way meant to be a criticism of the course but a reflection of the cost effectiveness of business. In my case I manage information at the leading edge of information technology this presents me with a significant problem. The fact that I apply LISA . Lifestyle Application, standards to every event means that I have no choice when it comes to the completion of some tasks.

That’s it... All I need to do now is read and follow the guidance of my mentor.

This is proactive self management.


We will now, briefly, talk about outsourcing and the utilisation of outside agencies. I have always promoted the use of resources outside my projects to clear activities from my plan. The identification of synergies and intellectual counter trade are two tools available to the project manager to expedite a task.

My final two tasks are two check my word count and to consult my tutor.

900 Words!

Raw Comments / TH Response

Theresa ... am I barking up the right tree?

Todo lists

Todo list

Produce Raw Document
Consult Theresa
Produce 1st Draft
Consult Theresa
Produce 1st Submission Document
Consult Theresa
Refine Text / Presentation
Approve Presntation
Print TMA01
File Copy #1
Post Copy #2


Plain sticky notes

Hello World!

Postit for Therasa to comment.

Rich sticky notes

TMA02 - Vision 23



Option 2 - Essay activity based on Block four.


Vision 23 – Alan Bramwell.


This essay is based upon the subject matter of  the Open University course Y159 Understanding Management. There are two primary source of information in Section Four Burns, T and Stalker, G. (1966) The Management of Innovation and Rosemary Stewart, R. (1982) Choices for the Manager. The leadership qualities of Genghis Khan and Lord Horatio Nelson were not mentioned, the writings of Thomas Hobbs and Robert Tressel will be discussed as being the two ends of a social spectrum that leads social conflict with the potential of  human damage. The Peterloo Massacre and Social Reform is the result of internal / external influences on business  and the demands/constraints which dictate decision making. The theories of Burns and Stalker have seen considerable change since 1966. The rise in the internet has increased the effect of external influence producing a shift in the mechanistic / organic balance of an organisation. The essay will look at parallels in business to the natural world and show theorists and analyst how nature provides the answer to many of today’s business problems.. The conclusion will focus will be on one roll within the world of sport, ‘The Junior Organizer’, how his roll as a stakeholders has changed. This is a study of the J Curve, (Information Vs Stability),  and The Butterfly Effect.


Block four commences with the role of stakeholders and goes on to reflect upon the the different types of organisations discussed in Block 2, (goals, ownership, sectors etc), being a collection of individuals working together to effectively achieve goals. A goal can be simply represented as a task that has properties, (Who, What, Why When and at least one Tangible Deliverable). The study of the organisation then goes on to discuss the environment, The External Environment, the Far Environment, Near Environment and the Internal Environment. The external influence of Technological Pressure has impacts upon the Internal Environment. Technology, (in the life cycle of the Sycamore Fig), can be represented by the development of chemicals and the line manager as the Fig wasp. The fig wasps protects the interest of the Sycamore Fig. In the reproductive cycle the fig has an internal enemy, the Nematode.  Nematodes could represent workers that do not recognise that they are stakeholders and are dependent upon the whole body for their survival. The Nematode is a parasite working against the establishment, it invades the body of the Fig Wasp whilst it performs it’s in no reproductive duties. The battle between stakeholders is chronicled in Robert Tressel’s, The Ragged Trouser Philanthropist,  the focus of the Labour Party Manifesto in the 1960’s. Thomas Hobbs, The Leviathan influenced the Thatcher years whilst Plato, The Republic, a classic. Lord Horatio Nelson and Genghis Khan could be considered the most influential leaders of our time, (Jobs and Gates too!). The Khan Meritocracy was in doubt the greatest of all empires. The Nelson Effect, (Communication, Delegation and Trust), had some parallels with the ethos of Genghis Khan. The modern manager needs to understand the art of war. The loss of

The Light Brigade is an example of poor communication and failure to support the troops. Generals watched as the Light Brigade faced the onslaught. They briefly won over the guns only to be defeated by a second force of Lancers as the ‘management’ failed to supply the resources, The Heavy Brigade could have secured victory. The work of Rosemary Stewart details the demands and constraints of managers. Within business as in war there are financial and political influences. Effective use of all the resources by a stakeholder is essential, there is no point in demanding high cost assets when the core business requires the quill. Businesses that do not move with the times risk extinction. The mechanistic / organic theories of Burns and Stalker have never been more relevant. The development of Open Systems has resulted in external influences impacting upon on the internal core of an organisation. Price catalogues are an example of this, where once produced annually the development of Intranet/Internet and Extranet solution means that ‘External Pressures’ are imposed upon a business in seconds. The works and studies of Sine, Mituashi and Kirsh draws attention to the impact of Information technology. The expected boom in projects after the Y2K did not happen. In 1998 Microsoft and Apple computer companies announced the collaborative venture ‘converging technologies’. The expectations of the business community has taken a long time to arrive, (many significant projects were put on hold). Promises of 70% efficiency in code production and the introduction of interoperable languages, (code that effectively talks to each other applications), is now coming true. The 31st January 2007 will be seen as a milestone in business industry. The arrival of Vista, and the impact upon organisations will not be seen time circa 2012.


In conclusion, the techniques that I would employ are those of the natural world and those of the great leaders.. There has to be great communication, leadership and trust.  The rise of JIT, (Just In Time), caused the fall of some businesses, external pressures imposed by manufactures like Toyota in Derby were too imposing for some small suppliers. Trafford Park, one the largest industrial community in the world is no longer the centre of worlds engineering.


The world of ‘The Junior Sports Organiser’ has changed in the last decade. Once a mentor could take students for a lesson at his/her leisure he/she is now governed be the demands and constraints of external influences. There is now significant legislation that governs people working with children. This has become a multi-million pound business with the government and education establishments gaining significantly from legislation.


At the start of the Blair government I was informed that the fiscal policy will be one of ‘Stealth Taxation’


I will let history prove this statement to be true or false.


Mentoring of children is now a business, it used to be fun – Alan Bramwell 2007.



Word Count: 1000                                             









Task 2.


There has been no feedback from my Tutor. This is no reflection upon Theresa as I have a clearly defined action plan that has meant that my she has had no visibility of my work to date.


The OU will realise that on any project there are internal and external pressures in an individual.  The control and management of synergies and external influences has dictated my life for 30 years.


The late submission of my work was essential to the success of my project, (the formation of my company).


I would like to thank the OU for their support and praise them for the quality of material and response to needs. I will not hesitate to recommend this course to the 40,000 people that I now represent, (regardless of my personal outcome).


I have achieved goals.


Without you my Vision would not have been made possible.


W-Count 1150

Todo lists

Todo list

Talk to Therasa
Talk More.
Follow her explicite instuctions
Do all that she asks
Purchase a printer
Print the approved solutions
Take Printed Output to Manchester OU Offices
Register with BCS
Consult OU Re: iT Masters Degree.
Consult OU Re: Business Degree
Consult Tutor Re: Personal Performace
Make an Executive Decision.
To-do item


Rich sticky notes


The Nine Roles Proposed by Belbin are:-

  1. Plant
    Creative, imaginative, unorthodox. Solves difficult problems. However tends to ignore incidentals and be too immersed to communicate effectively.

  2. Resource Investigator
    Extrovert, enthusiastic, communicative. Explores opportunities and networks with others. However can be over optimistic and loses interest after initial enthusiasm has waned.

  3. Co-ordinator
    Belbin's Co-ordinator is a mature, confident and a natural chairperson. Clarifies goals, promotes decision-making and delegates effectively. However can be seen as manipulative and controlling. Can over delegate by off loading personal work.

  4. Shaper
    Challenging, dynamic, thrives under pressure. Jumps hurdles using determination and courage. However can be easily provoked and ignorant of the feelings of others.

  5. Monitor Evaluator
    Even tempered, strategic and discerning. Sees all the options and judges accurately. However can lack drive and lack inspired leadership qualities.

  6. Team Worker
    Co-operative, relationship focused, sensitive and diplomatic. Belbin described the Team Worker as a good listener who builds relationships and who dislikes confrontation. However can be indecisive in crisis.

  7. Implementer
    Disciplined, reliable, conservative and efficient. Acts on ideas. However can be inflexible and slow to see new opportunities.

  8. Completer-Finisher
    Conscientious and anxious to get the job done. An eye for detail, good at searching out the errors. Finishes and delivers on time. However can be a worrier and reluctant to delegate.

  9. Specialist
    Single minded self starter. Dedicated and provides specialist knowledge. The rarer the supplier of this knowledge, said Belbin, the more dedicated the specialist. However can be stuck in their niche with little interest in the world outside it and dwell on technicalities.

Allowable Weakness

These summaries describe the characteristics of each role in the Belbin theory and also give 'allowable weakness' points.

This means that managers can expect these weaknesses to emerge and therefore an allowance should be made.

Therefore if a 'Team Worker' will have a natural tendency to be indecisive in a crisis, then the team can make sure that they don't have high expectations in that situation.

Team workers will be happiest if the crisis is foreseen and policy decisions which involve them made before the pressure is turned on.

It is evident that many of these roles will naturally conflict with each other.

It is very powerful when individuals within a team first understand that the conflicts that sometimes occur are caused by these natural behaviours and tendencies and not because the other person 'does not like me'.

ECA Option 2

Open University Y159 - Understanding Management.


ECA  Option 2


The Strategic Approach To Resource Management – Alan Bramwell.


To summarise the collective work of Fayol, Mintzberg, Maslow, Stewart, Belbin, and Taylor will be difficult.


When we focus on the ‘strategic approach’ we are drawn to the properties of ‘The Task’. In addition to those mention in the course notes we should respect the works of Hertzberg,  Burns and Stalker, Gantt  and  Berne.  There is much to be understood about management, we can not ignore game players.


Management is all about the ‘The Task’. There are two types of tasks. A standard task has a number of properties, including resource allocation. The special task ‘Milestone’ has all the properties of a standard task, including dependency links but has no resource allocation. The Milestone assists planning, the creation of a GANTT Chart and the production of the CPA, (Critical Path Analysis). Project managers group tasks into activities which are in turn grouped into phases. The collection of a group of projects is called a super project.  These have become the industry standards for the ‘strategic manager’.


It is the collection of information that drives the modern business. The four factors of constructing a business used to be Land, Labour, Material and Capital. The effective management of working capital was the key to success. Controlling the working capital is the life force of the business.  To this we must now add Information.


The first of the four strategic stages is Reflection and Analysis. The recording of accurate information with regards top the performance of a specific task is invaluable. The reflection and analysis of internal and external influences on the business can be achieved with accurate recording of facts. JIT, (Just In Time), inspection for total quality allows immediate reaction to an unexpected event from an external source. Controlling materials before they get embedded into the product is essential in today’s competitive markets. Stakeholders now have significant responsibility as the devolved ownership of the task has been made possible by Information Systems.


Establishing clear goals now become simple as we strive for more information about the task it is possible to find better ways of conducting the whole project. Allowing managers to multi-task with many concurrent projects allows flexibility and control. The more tasks a manager has to manage the more synergies he/she has can create and contingencies to keep the resources fully utilised. Information systems allow managers to effective communicate clear goals.


Reflection and analysis provide the fuel for the planning and scheduling of tasks. Interdependencies and best practises are gained by education and experience. Information systems and knowledge base solutions are one again essential to this process.


Finally we need to consider the true value of information. There should always be time to review and evaluate a project. The performance of individuals and mechanical resources is essential. Circumstances change the world does not stand still. Organisations are becoming less mechanistic and more organic. The influence of external forces, particularly legislative and technical is having huge impacts upon stakeholder.  The UK government, since the mid 1980’s have increasingly put more load of the employer. The administration of SSP, (Statutory Sick Pay), was one of the first applications that was trust upon employers. Companies once employed Personnel Officers who looked after the welfare of employees. As the introduction of effective personnel systems became the norm the roll of the Human Resource Executive immerged.


The roll, (the sum of the tasks assigned to the resource unit – Personnel Officer), is to effectively manage the ‘strategic approach’ to business that the theorists proclaim.


The one theory that is useful to my business is Planning In Order To Achieve Goals. This is essentially task management primarily theorised by Fayol, Taylor, Belbin, and Mitzberg.


Fayol had five functions, To Forecast, To Organise. To Command, To Co-Ordinate, To Control    which he synthesised fourteen principles for organisational design which included The specialisation/division of labour.  Today as managers we provide resource units with employment contract, job specifications and terms of reference designed to protect stakeholder interests.


Taylor ‘The Father Of Scientific Managemant’ immerged as an engineer at a similar time to Fayol. The white coat, stop watch and clip board were the tools of the trade for the ‘Time and Motion’ resource unit that evolved form his writings.


We have not yet discussed the task prioritisation which orders work in the the two scales of importance and urgency. This may well be seen by the A,B,C principle of file management. File ‘A’ Do it now, File ‘B’ of less importance but if left will become an ‘A’, File ‘C’, desirable but of low impact to the business and finally file WPB, waste paper basket, when combined with the theory that every piece of paper should be handled only one we have an effective working procedure. (This is why I have introduced a pre-submission document to my OU action plan and deferred all my work to the end of the course. I have clear objective for this course, one of which is to apply the theories of the masters.


This nicely lends it way into the works of Meredith Belbin who discusses team roles, Implementor, Coordinator, Shaper, Plant, Resource Investigator, Monitor / Evaluator, Team Worker, Completer Finisher and the work  Rosemary Stewart who informed us about Demands and Constraints.  All these factors affect the planning in order to achieve goals. To ignore one of these basic principles of management is criminal.


The age of information technology makes this easy, the modern project manager has to benefit of computing and volumes of facts and figures at his/her finger tips.



Solutions like PMW, (Project Managers Workbench), were once highly value pieces of software. Open Workbench is now Open Source. CA-Superproject, (Computer Associates) and MS-Project, (Microsoft) are other example of applications that have evolved from the fundamentals of the ‘strategic approach’.  


The modern ‘Strategic Manager’ is only a click away from success. The evolution of review and evaluation will continue.


Word Count : 1000






                                                     Task 2


I have issues with education born about by a bad learning experience which has turned me into a maverick. The cost in terms of career opportunity is significant. The production of academic reports frustrates me. The help that I needed was not forthcoming, I now fear the system, I find it difficult to judge myself and almost impossible to submit work for assessment. The result of my failure to address this s has left me psychologically damaged with a far too large be perfect driver.


This is a major weakness in that I do not value my own work, it is immature, irrational. The very process of creating an academic piece of work is a very emotive subject. The realisation that I have a weakness is one that I am trying to address. I was damaged by a bad tutor and have not recovered. The resulting events took me out of the education system and, (to my loss), I have adopted my own personal style.


I will address my learning difficulties with the assistance of my Open University Tutor. I have purposely held back from submitting my work as the reflection on past experiences is emotionally upsetting. I have been very satisfied with the OU and will look forward to further learning experiences. Once I have ‘broken the mould’ and establish the correct learning methods I am certain that I will excel. 


I can not support this work with evidence as I have no evidence to reflect upon.


Henry Mintzberg

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Professor Henry Mintzberg, OC , OQ , Ph.D. , D.h.c. , FRSC (born September 2, 1939) is an internationally renowned academic and author on business and management. He is currently the Cleghorn Professor of Management Studies at the Desautels Faculty of Management of McGill University in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, where he has been teaching since 1968, after earning his Master's degree in Management (M.B.A.) and Ph.D. from the MIT Sloan School of Management in 1965 and 1968 respectively.[1]

Henry Mintzberg writes prolifically on the topics of management and business strategy, with more than 140 articles and thirteen books to his name. His seminal book, The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, criticizes some of the practices of strategic planning today and is considered required reading for anyone who seriously wants to consider taking on a strategy-making role within their organization.

He recently published a book entitled Managers Not MBAs which outlines what he believes to be wrong with management education today and, rather controversially, singles out prestigious graduate management schools like Harvard Business School and the Wharton Business School at the University of Pennsylvania as examples of how obsession with numbers and an over-zealous attempt at making management into a science actually can damage the discipline of management. He also suggests that a new masters program, targeted at practicing managers (as opposed to younger students with little real world experience), and emphasizing practical issues, may be more suitable.

Ironically, although Professor Mintzberg is quite critical about the strategy consulting business, he has twice won the McKinsey Award for publishing the best article in the Harvard Business Review.

In 1997 he was made an Officer of the Order of Canada. In 1998 he was made an Officer of the National Order of Quebec.

He is married to Sasha Sadilova and has two children, Susie and Lisa.

[edit] Theory on Organizational Forms

The organizational configurations framework of Mintzberg is a model that describes six valid organizational configurations

  1. Mutual adjustment, which achieves coordination by the simple process of informal communication (as between two operating employees)
  2. Direct supervision, in which coordination is achieved by having one person issue orders or instructions to several others whose work interrelates (as when a boss tells others what is to be done, one step at a time)
  3. Standardization of work processes, which achieves coordination by specifying the work processes of people carrying out interrelated tasks (those standards usually being developed in the technostructure to be carried out in the operating core, as in the case of the work instructions that come out of time-and-motion studies)
  4. Standardization of outputs, which achieves coordination by specifying the results of different work (again usually developed in the technostructure, as in a financial plan that specifies subunit performance targets or specifications that outline the dimensions of a product to be produced)
  5. Standardization of skills (as well as knowledge), in which different work is coordinated by virtue of the related training the workers have received (as in medical specialists - say a surgeon and an anesthetist in an operating room –responding almost automatically to each other’s standardized procedures)
  6. Standardization of norms, in which it is the norms infusing the work that are controlled, usually for the entire organization, so that everyone functions according to the same set of beliefs (as in a religious order)

According to the organizational configurations model of Mintzberg each organization can consist of a maximum of six basic parts:

  1. Strategic Apex (top management)
  2. Middle Line (middle management)
  3. Operating Core (operations, operational processes)
  4. Technostructure (analysts that design systems, processes, etc)
  5. Support Staff (support outside of operating workflow)
  6. Ideology (halo of beliefs and traditions; norms, values, culture)

According to the organizational configurations framework there are six valid coordinating mechanisms in organizations:

  1. Direct supervision (typical for entrepreneurial organizations)
  2. Standardization of work (typical for machine organizations)
  3. Standardization of skills (typical for professional organizations)
  4. Standardization of outputs (typical for diversified organizations)
  5. Mutual Adjustment (typical for innovative organizations)
  6. Standardization of norms (typical for missionary organizations)

[edit] Bibliography

1973 The Nature of Managerial Work
1979 The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research
1983 Power In and Around Organizations
1983 Structure in 5's: Designing Effective Organizations
1989 Mintzberg on Management: Inside Our Strange World of Organizations
1991 The Strategy Process: (with Joe Lampel, Sumantra Ghoshal and J.B. Quinn)
1994 The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning: Reconceiving the Roles for Planning, Plans, Planners
1998 Strategy Safari (with Bruce Ahlstrand and Joe Lampel)
2000 Managing Publicly (with Jacques Bourgault)
2000 Why I Hate Flying
2004 Managers not MBAs
2005 Strategy Bites back

[edit] External link


Fayol (1841-1925) Functions and Principles of Management

Henri Fayol Henri Fayol, a French engineer and director of mines, was little unknown outside France until the late 40s when Constance Storrs published her translation of Fayol's 1916 " Administration Industrielle et Generale ".

Fayol's career began as a mining engineer. He then moved into research geology and in 1888 joined, Comambault as Director. Comambault was in difficulty but Fayol turned the operation round. On retirement he published his work - a comprehensive theory of administration - described and classified administrative management roles and processes then became recognised and referenced by others in the growing discourse about management. He is frequently seen as a key, early contributor to a classical or administrative management school of thought (even though he himself would never have recognised such a "school").

His theorising about administration was built on personal observation and experience of what worked well in terms of organisation. His aspiration for an "administrative science" sought a consistent set of principles that all organizations must apply in order to run properly.

F. W. Taylor published "The Principles of Scientific Management" in the USA in 1911, and Fayol in 1916 examined the nature of management and administration on the basis of his French mining organisation experiences..

Fayol synthesised various tenets or principles of organisation and management and Taylor on work methods, measurement and simplification to secure efficiencies. Both referenced functional specialisation.

Both Fayol and Taylor were arguing that principles existed which all organisations - in order to operate and be administered efficiently - could implement. This type of assertion typifies a "one best way" approach to management thinking. Fayol's five functions are still relevant to discussion today about management roles and action.

  1. to forecast and plan - prevoyance
    examine the future and draw up plans of action
  2. to organise
    build up the structure, material and human of the undertaking
  3. to command
    maintain activity among the personnel
  4. to co-ordinate
    bind together, unify and harmonise activity and effort
  5. to control
    see that everything occurs in conformity with policy and practise

Fayol also synthesised 14 principles for organisational design and effective administration. It is worthwhile reflecting on these are comparing the conclusions to contemporary utterances by Peters, Kanter and Handy to name but three management gurus. Fayol's 14 principles are:

In the same way that Alfred P Sloan, the executive head of General Motors reorganised the company into semi-autonomous divisions in the 1920s, corporations undergoing reorganisation still apply "classical organisation" principles - very much in line with Fayol's recommendations.

Catering Establishment Exercise
To Read
Pugh, Hickson and Hinings, Writers on Organisation, Penguin
Child J, Organisation - Problems and Practice.

(© Chris Jarvis) Last updated on: 09/09/2005 16:37:30

FW Taylor

Frederick Winslow Taylor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Frederick Winslow Taylor
Frederick Winslow Taylor

Frederick Winslow Taylor (March 20, 1856 to March 21, 1915) was an American engineer who sought to improve industrial efficiency. A management consultant in his later years, he is sometimes called "The Father of Scientific Management." He was one of the intellectual leaders of the Efficiency Movement and his ideas, broadly conceived, were highly influential in the Progressive Era.



[edit] Life

Taylor was born in 1856 to a wealthy Quaker family in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. He wanted to attend Harvard University, but poor eyesight forced him to consider an alternative career. In 1874, he became an apprentice patternmaker, gaining shop-floor experience that would inform the rest of his career. He obtained a degree in Mechanical Engineering through a highly unusual (for the time) series of correspondence courses at Stevens Institute of Technology where he was a Brother of the Gamma Chapter of Theta Xi, graduating in 1883 (Kanigel 1997:182-183,199). He and Maunsel White (with a team of assistants) developed high speed steel. He eventually became a professor at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth College.

Taylor believed that the industrial management of his day was amateurish, that management could be formulated as an academic discipline, and that the best results would come from the partnership between a trained and qualified management and a cooperative and innovative workforce. Each side needed the other, and there was no need for trade unions.

Louis Brandeis, who was an active propagandist of Taylorism (Montgomery 1989: 250), coined the term scientific management in the course of his argument for the Eastern Rate Case, which Taylor used in the title of his monograph The Principles of Scientific Management, published in 1911. His approach is also often referred to, as Taylor's Principles, or frequently disparagingly, as Taylorism. Taylor's scientific management consisted of four principles:

  1. Replace rule-of-thumb work methods with methods based on a scientific study of the tasks.
  2. Scientifically select, train, and develop each employee rather than passively leaving them to train themselves.
  3. "detailed instruction and supervision of each worker in the performance of that worker's discrete task" (Montgomery 1997: 250).
  4. Divide work nearly equally between managers and workers, so that the managers apply scientific management principles to planning the work and the workers actually perform the tasks

[edit] Managers and workers

Taylor had very precise ideas about how to introduce his system:

"It is only through enforced standardization of methods, enforced adaption of the best implements and working conditions, and enforced cooperation that this faster work can be assured. And the duty of enforcing the adaption of standards and enforcing this cooperation rests with management alone."

(Taylor, Principles of Scientific Management, cited by Montgomery 1989:229, italics with Taylor)

Workers were supposed to be incapable to understand what they were doing. According to Taylor this was true even for rather simple tasks. "'I can say, without the slightest hesitation,' Taylor told a congressional committee, 'that the science of handling pig-iron is so great that the man who is ... physically able to handle pig-iron and is sufficiently phlegmatic and stupid to choose this for his occupation is rarely able to comprehend the science of handling pig-iron."

(Montgomery 1989:251)

The introduction of his system was often resented by workers and provoked numerous strikes. The strike at Watertown Arsenal led to the congressional investigation in 1912.

[edit] Propaganda techniques

Taylor promised to reconcile labour and capital. "With the triumph of scientific management, unions would have nothing left to do, and they would have been cleansed of their most evil feature: the restriction of output. To underscore this idea, Taylor fashioned the myth that 'there has never been a strike of men working under scientific management', trying to give it credibility by constant repetition. In similar fashion he incessantly linked his proposals to shorter hours of work, without bothering to produce evidence of "Taylorized" firms that reduced working hours, and he revised his famous tale of Schmidt carrying pig iron at Bethlehem Steel at least three times, obscuring same aspects of his study and stressing others, so that each successive version made Schmidt's exertions more impressive, more voluntary and more rewarding to him that [sic!] the last. Unlike [Harrington] Emerson, Taylor was not a charlatan, but his ideological message required the suppression of all evidence of worker's dissent, of coercion, or of any human motives or aspirations other than those his vision of progress could encompass." (Montgomery 1989:254)[1]

[edit] Management theory

Taylor thought that by analysing work, the "One Best Way" to do it would be found. He is most remembered for developing the time and motion study. He would break a job into its component parts and measure each to the hundredth of a minute. One of his most famous studies involved shovels. He noticed that workers used the same shovel for all materials. He determined that the most effective load was 21½ lb, and found or designed shovels that for each material would scoop up that amount. He was generally unsuccessful in getting his concepts applied and was dismissed from Bethlehem Steel. It was largely through the efforts of his disciples (most notably H.L. Gantt) that industry came to implement his ideas. Nevertheless, the book he wrote after parting company with Bethlehem Steel, Shop Management, sold well.

[edit] Relations with ASME

Taylor was president of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) from 1906 to 1907. While president, he tried to implement his system into the management of the ASME but was met with much resistance. He was only able to reorganize the publications department and then only partially. He also forced out the ASME's long-time secretary, Morris L. Cooke, and replaced him with Calvin W. Rice. His tenure as president was trouble-ridden and marked the beginning of a period of internal dissension within the ASME during the Progressive Era (Jaffe 1957:34).

In 1912, Taylor collected a number of his articles into a book-length manuscript which he submitted to the ASME for publication. The ASME formed an ad hoc committee to review the text. The committee included Taylor allies such as James Mapes Dodge and Henry R. Towne. The committee delegated the report to the editor of the American Machinist, Leon P. Alford. Alford was a critic of the Taylor system and the report was negative. The committee modified the report slightly, but accepted Alford's recommendation not to publish Taylor's book. Taylor angrily withdrew the book and published Principles without ASME approval (Jaffe 1957:36-40; Nelson 1980:181-184)...

[edit] Taylor's influence

[edit] United States

  • Carl Barth helped Taylor to develop speed-and-feed-calculating slide rules to a previously unknown level of usefulness. Similar aids are still used in machine shops today. Barth became an early consultant on scientific management and later taught at Harvard.
  • H. L. Gantt developed the Gantt chart, a visual aid for scheduling tasks and displaying the flow of work.
  • Harrington Emerson introduced scientific management to the railroad industry, and proposed the dichotomy of staff versus line employees, with the former advising the latter.
  • Morris Cooke adapted scientific management to educational and municipal organizations.
  • Hugo Münsterberg created industrial psychology.
  • Lillian Gilbreth introduced psychology to management studies.
  • Frank Gilbreth (husband of Lillian) discovered scientific management while working in the construction industry, eventually developing motion studies independently of Taylor. These logically complemented Taylor's time studies, as time and motion are two sides of the efficiency improvement coin. The two fields eventually became time and motion study.
  • Harvard University, one of the first American universities to offer a graduate degree in business management in 1908, based its first-year curriculum on Taylor's scientific management.
  • Harlow S. Person, as dean of Dartmouth's Amos Tuck School of Administration and Finance, promoted the teaching of scientific management.
  • James O. McKinsey, professor of accounting at the University of Chicago and founder of the consulting firm bearing his name, advocated budgets as a means of assuring accountability and of measuring performance.

[edit] France

In France, Le Chatelier translated Taylor's work and introduced scientific management throughout government owned plants during World War I. This influenced the French theorist Henri Fayol, whose 1916 Administration Industrielle et Générale emphasized organizational structure in management.

[edit] Switzerland

In Switzerland, the American Edward Albert Filene established the International Management Institute to spread information about management techniques.

[edit] USSR

In the USSR, Lenin was very impressed by Taylorism, which he and Stalin sought to incorporate into Soviet manufacturing. Taylorism and the mass production methods of Henry Ford thus became highly influential during the early years of the Soviet Union. Nevertheless "[...] Frederick Taylor's methods have never really taken root in the Soviet Union." (Atta 1986: 335). The voluntaristic approach of the Stakhanovite movement in the 1930s of setting individual records was diametrically opposed to Taylor's systematic approach and proved to be counter-productive. (Atta 1986: 331). The stop-and-go of the production process - workers having nothing to do at the beginning of a month and 'storming' during illegal extra shifts at the end of the month - which prevailed even in the 1980s had nothing to do with the successfully taylorized plants e.g. of Toyota which are characterized by continuous production processes which are continuously improved (Head 2005: 38-59).

"The easy availability of replacement labor, which allowed Taylor to choose only 'first-class men,' was an important condition for his system's success." (Atta 1986: 329) The situation in the Soviet Union was very different. "Because work is so unrythmic, the rational manager will hire more workers than he would need if supplies were even in order to have enough for storming. Because of the continuing labor shortage, managers are happy to pay needed workers more than the norm, either by issuing false job orders, assigning them to higher skill grades than they deserve on merit criteria, giving them 'loose' piece rates, or making what is supposed to be 'incentive' pay, premia for good work, effectively part of the normal wage. As Mary Mc Auley has suggested under these circumstances piece rates are not an incentive wage, but a way of justifying giving workers whatever they 'should' be getting, no matter what their pay is supposed to be according to the official norms." (Atta 1986: 333)

Taylor and his theories are also referenced (and put to practice) in the 1921 dystopian novel We by Yevgeny Zamyatin.

[edit] Articles

Taylor's life and work was discussed in Cynthia Crossen's "Deja Vu" column in the Wall Street Journal, November 6, 2006.

[edit] Footnotes

  1. ^ For the stories about Schmidt Montgomery refers to Charles D. Wrege and Amadeo G. Perroni, "Taylor's Pig Tale: A Historical Analysis of Frederick W. Taylor's Pig-Iron experiments" in: Academy of Management Journal, 17 (March 1974), 6-27

[edit] References

  • Aitken, Hugh (1960), Taylorism at Watertown Arsenal. Scientific management in action, 1908-1915, Harvard UPCompara
  • Atta , Don Van (1986), “Why Is There No Taylorism in the Soviet Union?” in: Comparative Politics, Vol. 18, No. 3. (Apr., 1986), pp. 327-337
  • Boddy, David (2002). Management: An Introduction, 2nd ed., New York: Pearson Education. ISBN 0-273-65518-3. 
  • Head, Simon (2005), The new ruthless economy. Work and power in the digital age, Oxford University Press, Paperback Edition
  • Jaffe, William (1957). L.P. Alford and the Evolution of Modern Industrial Management. With an introduction by David B. Porter. New York: New York University Press. 
  • Kanigel, Robert (1997). The One Best Way: Frederick Winslow Taylor and the Enigma of Efficiency. New York: Viking. ISBN 0-670-86402-1. 
  • Montgomery, David (1989), The Fall of the House of Labor: The Workplace, the State, and American Labor Activism, 1865-1925, Cambridge University Press, Paperback edition
  • Nelson, Daniel (1980). Frederick W. Taylor and the Rise of Scientific Management. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0-299-08160-5. 
  • Nelson, Daniel (ed.) (1992). A Mental Revolution: Scientific Management Since Taylor. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. ISBN 0-8142-0567-4. 
  • Taylor, Frederick, Scientific Management (includes "Shop Management" (1903), "The Principles of Scientific Management" (1911) and "Testimony Before the Special House Committee" (1912)), Routledge, 2003, ISBN 0415279836
  • Weisbord, Marvin (2004). Productive Workplaces Revisited (Chapter 2: Scientific Management Revisited: A Tale of Two Taylors; Chapter 3: The Consulting Engineer: Taylor Invents a New Profession.). ISBN 0-7879-7117-0. 

[edit] External links

Rosemary Stewart

Rosemary Stewart (business theorist)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Rosemary Stewart widely known for her extensive writings on managerial work and behaviour. Her career has been in management research and teaching, along for seven years with managing. Her doctorate was at the London School of Economics and she has an Hon DPhil from Uppsala University, Sweden.

She was a Fellow in Organisational Behaviour at Templeton College, Oxford, and she is now an Honorary Fellow and Co-director of the Oxford Health Care Management Institute at Templeton College. Her research has covered a wide range of subjects and organisations in industry, commerce, local government and the NHS. Her main research interests are in managerial work and behaviour and management in the NHS. She has run workshops for many years for NHS chief executives and, currently, for chairs. She has lectured in many parts of the world.

[edit] Bibliography

Rosemary Stewart is author of more than a dozen books: Author of 12 books on management and edited books and numerous articles in academic and practitioner journals. Areas: general management, managerial behaviour, health care management. Winner John Player Award for best management book in 1976.

1995 Leading in the NHS: a practical guide (Macmillan)
1999 The Reality of Management (Butterwork-Heinemann),
1999 Managerial Work (History of Management Thought (Aldershot, England).) by Rosemary Stewart (Editor) (Hardcover)
1972 The Reality of Organizations.Publisher: Pan Macmillan. ISBN 0-330-23249-5
2003 Evidence-based Management ISBN 0-9579876-2-5
1994 Managing in Britain and Germany by Jean-Louis Barsoux, et al (Hardcover)
Woman in a Man's World
The Diversity of Management. by Rosemary Stewart, Jean-Louis Barsoux
Managing today and tomorrow. by Rosemary Stewart
Checkmate, by Rosemary Stewart (Author)

Forest 404



Rich sticky notes

Redcamel Systems

Forest 404 is a new internet search engine gifted by Redcamel Systems.
Watch this space for Protopage User Group Searches.